Hackney Citizen

Cash for riot-hit businesses used to fuel ‘fashion hub’ claim Mare Street traders

Narroway and Mare Street businesses are disappointed at how £2 million fund is being spent

Narroway

Feeling left out: Narroway traders. Photograph: Hackney Citizen

A £2m fund secured by the council to help properties and businesses damaged in the 2011 riots is being used to the detriment of the area, according to traders on one of Hackney’s oldest shopping streets.

Businesses on Mare Street and the Narroway are questioning why £1.5m of the fund is being spent on building a new up-market fashion hub on their doorstep and not on helping the existing businesses in the area.

As well as the riots fund, the council negotiated a further £3.3m in a deal with Network Rail to make public realm improvements to Hackney Central and, specifically, the area in and around Network Rail’s railway arches on Morning Lane – the site of the new fashion hub.

However, traders said the planned £5.3m total spending will only have a degenerative effect by dragging footfall and trade from the Narroway.

A group of affected shop owners, speaking to the Hackney Citizen on condition of anonymity, said local businesses had already held meetings to discuss the council’s use of the funds and ways of standing up for an area they feel has long been neglected.

One owner said: “All these years we never got any help and then suddenly, when the help is available, they’re investing it in this fashion hub when [the fashion retailers there] are going to be making a lot of money anyway.”

The remaining £0.5m of funding is for shop front improvements which can be bid for through the council, but require match-funding – described as “usual practice for major grants bids”.

“The council are asking for those struggling shopkeepers to contribute to the costs but a lot of businesses can’t afford it,” said the same owner.

“Shop fronts aren’t going to create more people in the area, the only way you’re going to get more people is by having a variety of shops and having good businesses – and good businesses are not going to want to come in to the area when you’ve got all these betting offices and pawnbrokers.”

Voicing similar concerns, another business-owner, who has operated in the Narroway for 18 years, said: “All the good shops are gone now and nearly all are coming back as pawnbrokers. Most of the local people always come and buy from us – that’s why we are surviving.”

Explaining that business was down 40 to 50 per cent since the riots and the opening of the Westfield shopping centre in Stratford, he continued: “There are five pawnbrokers within nearly 100 feet, and betting shops too. What kind of people are we going to get down here?”

Hackney Council said they formally applied to the Government for stronger powers to control the concentration of betting shops in the borough through the Sustainable Communities Act in August 2009.

Hackney MP Diane Abbott has previously commented on these issues by saying: “Healthy and diverse high streets are the cornerstone of local communities.”

Aside from the proliferation of betting shops and pawnbrokers, the owners said the lack of adequate street lighting on the Narroway was having a negative impact both socially and financially, and that it was an issue previously raised with the council.

The twelve railway arches set to house the new retail hub on nearby Morning Lane have been vacated of all their previous indigenous businesses (mainly car mechanics and machinists).

It is expected the arches’ owners Network Rail, acting in partnership with the council, will attract big name retailers who will join the area’s existing up-market residents of Burberry, Pringle and Aquascutum.

The creation of up to 200 jobs is predicted and the council have said that all of these will be advertised through a council-run scheme, to ensure employment goes to local residents.

However, commenting on a previous Hackney Citizen article on the retail development, local resident, Luke Muziwa, said: “Those very arches were occupied by hard working people who provided valid services to the residents of Hackney for over 20 years.

“I did my apprenticeship at the MOT station in Morning Lane when no one else was willing to give me a chance and it pains me to see how they were treated.”

That commercial landlords are preparing for a cash windfall was confirmed by reports of one building owner who, when advertising the sale of a property on Morning Lane, described the surrounding area as a “soon to be East London Carnaby Street”.

However, traders on the Narroway have said the fashion hub will be no more than a “gated retail complex” that takes advantage of the geography of the area without improving it or integrating with it.

Sharing his fellow trader’s concerns, Pawan Chawla, the owner of the Narroway’s Designer Baby Ltd store, said businesses were calling on the council for practical support – such as reducing business rates for a time – to help keep their “heads above water”.

Mr Chawla said: “We were affected by the riots. The fashion hub is a new development and the money is being spent on this new development when it was supposed to help us.

“That’s a different area. Those who shop there – they don’t come here. They’re just giving us the impression it’s going to help the area, but it’s not going to help the Narroway.”

Tagged as: , , , , ,

6 Responses »

  1. Hackney Council hates small businesses.

    Offensive comment?

  2. Is anyone genuinely surprised? It’s just another example of the Blairite obsession with ‘modernisation’ and big brands. Shameful!

    Offensive comment?

  3. Andrew, get with Nu-Hackney.

    Katie and Alex have as much right to shop for skinny All Saints jeans on their Hackney doorsteps as Ahmed and Fatyma have for their FONE-SELL-4-CASH-PAYDAY-LOAN!

    Offensive comment?

  4. But apparently, Gaz and Delroy SHOULDN’T enjoy the right to put a fiver each way on the gee-gees, because the Pipeists don’t approve!

    Offensive comment?

  5. Looks like this is going ahead in a big way:

    http://www.hackneyhaute.com/

    Offensive comment?

  6. Ooh, ghetto chic!

    “This is an opportunity for the most daring brands in fashion to build on the area’s anti-social capital.” :-/

    Offensive comment?

Comment